Saturday, February 18, 2012

What legislation attempted to satisfy the southern demand to maintain a balance in the Senate between free sta?

Kansas-Nebraska Act

Fugitive Slave Act

Citizens Choice Act of 185

Nebraska Compromise





2.) What theory promoted by Stephen Douglas would allow the people of a territory to allow or forbid slavery?

Legislative options

Popular sovereignty

Territorial rights

Northwest OrdinanceWhat legislation attempted to satisfy the southern demand to maintain a balance in the Senate between free sta?there is no such legislation.
  • kbb used car value
  • calculate percentage
  • What legislation requires all first aid treatment to be recorded?

    How long do records need to be keptWhat legislation requires all first aid treatment to be recorded?This type of Legislation is generally State or local. In most areas, there isn't any such legislation that specifically requires ALL "first aid" to be recorded. Usually, any such requirement is targeted to specific health care entities, such as Hospitals and EMS (emergency medical services / 911), and sometimes even then, only certain interventions are recorded (giving someone a band aid for a hang-nail doesn't usually require documentation).

    The most common misconception is EMS is the medical record being a "legal document". In reality, it is not. A "Lea; document" has specific legal definitions, such as a document signed by a judge or court clerk. While it can certainly be used in court, it is used in a similar way as any piece of evidence. This is why much of the requirement for documentation rests with the policies of that particular service providing the care.

    An individual for example (in most states, with "good sam laws" varying widely) has no such requirement, though the care they provide will likely be recorded by EMS if they take over care.

    Good luck with your research, if you find anything I haven't, please post it, I'd love to read it.

    What is the name/act of legislation that required employers to hire women over men because they were women?

    I'm writing some study notes for school and i vaguely remember our teacher telling us about at one point in history (it may be only Australia :S), where if there were a number of candidates for a job, women had to be selected just because they were women (and had the same qualifications etc. as the other candidates). Does anyone know what this law was called or anything about it?What is the name/act of legislation that required employers to hire women over men because they were women?Not sure about Australia, but in the US it's called Affirmative Action or Quotas. Many places are starting to outlaw such practices.What is the name/act of legislation that required employers to hire women over men because they were women?In the United States, it is called "affirmative action," and quotas (or, euphemistically, "targets") are often used as a way to force the desired results. In Britain (and, therefore, in many Commonwealth countries), it is called "POSITIVE DISCRIMINATION." So, that term might be what is used in Australia.

    Legislation for sexual acts that result in a Disease that kills?

    Do you think in todays day and age the law needs to set legislation against sexual acts like anal sex that produces diseases like aids that kill just like street drugs?.Do you think if there where jail terms for sexual acts that harm society that the rate of disease would drop dramatically? If the law was to bring in legislation into the adult entertainment industry do you think it would save lives ?.Legislation for sexual acts that result in a Disease that kills?You're too late, dude. The Supreme Court just 3 1/2 years ago said that anal sex is a constitutional right.



    Should they reverse that decision? Yes, they should. They should do so because they lied about the Constitution. Sex is NOT a constitutional right, ..... like abortion is NOT a constitutional right. But will they reverse it? Who knows.Legislation for sexual acts that result in a Disease that kills?AIDS is not passed by anal sex alone. You can catch it from non sexual contact as well, dirty needles. What does need to be done is more programs to inform people like yourself who no nothing on the subject at least the basics.Legislation for sexual acts that result in a Disease that kills?No. It's the responsibility of adults to regulate their sexual behavior, not the state. Everyone knows the risks of unprotected sex - anal, vaginal, or oral - they all carry risks.



    If a person deliberately set out to infect others without telling them they had HIV, and with malice, then they can (and have been) charged with crimes and ended up in prison. For most people though, it is not a malicious thing. Many don't even know their status when having sex.



    Let's keep the law out of our bedrooms.



    There are plenty of other things that are deadly that we could have laws about - how about banning McDonalds and smoking? Both are known to killLegislation for sexual acts that result in a Disease that kills?
    I believe it is a law, and has been for some time, that if you have a communicable disease you have to disclose it to the other party involved. If the other person was not informed, and gets the disease, it is a criminal offense.

    Wisconsin just passed common sense legislation calling for a photo ID to vote?

    Why are liberals screaming like school girls that Wisconsin is now Mississippi of the 1950's?Wisconsin just passed common sense legislation calling for a photo ID to vote?The liberals are just that way. common sense escapes them. They fail to realize they have to present an ID to buy a beer. A vote is more important then a beer.Wisconsin just passed common sense legislation calling for a photo ID to vote?
    In OK you don't have to present a photo ID card to vote, although many do. Your voter registration card is just as good as a driver's license or state ID. I have a valid LA state ID as well as a valid OK driver's license.

    What Wisconsin is doing is violating federal laws. You do not have to pay anything to register to vote. Poll taxes are illegal, yet that's exactly the Wisconsin governor signed into law yesterday. Liberals know United States history. It's very, very obvious that conservatives do NOT know United States history and are totally incapable of learning ANY lessons about government from it.
    It's the conservatives in the USA that are screaming the loudest, not the liberals.

    Drivers' licenses ARE NOT FREE. You PAY for a driver's license. Part of what you are paying for is the technology and machines that take that photograph and put it on your driver's license or state I. I PAID for my LA state idea, but less than what a driver's license would cost - about $10 less. I paid less than that to have my OK driver's license re-issued. How do I know this? I lost my OK driver's license on Christmas Eve in Greater New Orleans. It's quite obvious that some one is not old enough to have gotten a driver's license yet.Wisconsin just passed common sense legislation calling for a photo ID to vote?It's really a shame republicans never have any economic legislation ideas, you're only focused on how to keep the doors open to the tea party types and shut out younger and city type people, who typically swing democrat. Here is a fact. 1 in 3 people in NY don't have a driver's licenses or a car. How is it fair to say he or she can not vote?
    All it does is deter the people from voting. Not everybody has an ID. So for the population of people that don't probably wont spend 40 bucks to get one so therefore less people will vote. Secondly the republicans are paranoid that people are going around to different cities and voting twice which is absurd. Who would waste time trying to vote twice, 2 votes wont make a difference any way.Wisconsin just passed common sense legislation calling for a photo ID to vote?Man, you gotta love Scott Walker and the Wisconsin Congress.



    And you know, I'm sure, why the loser libs are screaming like school girls (with that real shrill screech of the loser lib loon) about this. They know that each bogus voter registration that groups like ACORN scum and the other community disorganizers bring in will need to have a photo ID matched to it. Let's hope every State adapts that method of voting.



    I wouldn't be surprised if eric 'butt' holder tries to sue them somehow and jam things up. You know the democrap mantra -%26gt; "Vote early and vote often"Wisconsin just passed common sense legislation calling for a photo ID to vote?
    liberals don't like it because it will crack down on voter fraud,and it is constitutional,no one is required to pay a tax to vote,they just have to prove they are who they say they are. i highly doubt there are many without some form of id,and those that need one can probably get one free of charge
    The liberals are very active in voter fraud as we all know.



    And only a liberal child would really believe that seniors don't have ID"S. That notion really

    brings to light, how out of touch they are from reality. Someone told them that nonsence and they

    might really beleive it%26gt; WHat a jokeWisconsin just passed common sense legislation calling for a photo ID to vote?
    is it a poll tax? those are unconstitutional. an american citizen cannot be required to pay a fee in order to vote.

    "At the ceremony in 1964 formalizing the 24th Amendment, President Lyndon Johnson noted that: "There can be no one too poor to vote.""
    Some illegal alien that somehow migrated to Wisconsin, might be able to get a picture ID and be disenfranchised.
    The Texas Legislature just passed the same thing. I love listening to the "liberals" screaming!
    The Unions will be out in protest
    It's been that way in Conn. for years.
    1. College Student IDs do not count in your "Common Sense" law



    2. Not everyone has a photo ID. Your "Common Sense" law will keep most seniors and working poor from voting.

    Why do Libtards keep blaming the GOP for not getting their legislation passed when they controlled Congress?

    Most Americans with a pea of a brain can figure out that when Democrats have both the majority in the House and the Senate and they can't pass stuff its not because of the Republicans, its because several members of its own party know the ideas stink.Why do Libtards keep blaming the GOP for not getting their legislation passed when they controlled Congress?Obstruction by filibusters. you're either a moron or knowingly denying that cons filibuster everything.Why do Libtards keep blaming the GOP for not getting their legislation passed when they controlled Congress?
    You seem to be UNFAMILIAR with Senate rules put into place while Republicans were in the majority. Lots of legislation cleared the House...like financial reforms and even a PUBLIC OPTION for health care, only to be S L O W E D down in the Senate. There are all sorts of parliamentary rules and procedures that make watching C-SPAN2 really b-o-r-i-n-g, and there are dirty tricks that the minority party (in this case, the GOP) can pull to BLOCK things (like CANCELING meetings on vital issues...sort of EXTORTION, but "legal"). More than 200 consumer-protecting or jobs-creating legislations were PASSED in spite of the dirty tricks and filibustering of the SAY NO Republicans, and were then signed into LAW by the Democrats (liberals included). See whitehouse.gov and also recovery.gov for more details.



    "Point of Order" (to quote a Senator), your insistence on assuming that Democrats are synonymous with Liberals (or "Libtards" as you so mockingly and erroneously suggest) is yet another inaccuracy in your query. Most Democrats are a combination of liberal, moderate, progressive, and conservative---all of which usually adds up to Moderate. We are better with budgetary matters than the always-run-us-into-deficits-and-job-outs鈥?Republicans, and Democrats succeeded in doing something totalitarian-controlling Republicans FAILED: They reduced the deficit as of June by 8%---you know, that deficit that the GOP caused due to their FAILED fiscal policies from 2001 through to 2007!Why do Libtards keep blaming the GOP for not getting their legislation passed when they controlled Congress?Every party has to pass the buck to someone else, and lay blame on someone other than themselves, reps dems everyone. If you ask me, they're all a pack of screwups and need to be excised from government completely. Personally, I think we need to reboot the constitution and start from scratch and remove EVERYONE in office and hold brand new elections. Of course that will never happen, but it is what NEEDS to happen.



    PS: In response to the filibuster, you do know that a filibuster can be voted down right? Owning the house, senate and executive office, you would think they hold enough votes to shut down a filibuster. Don't think that just because you're smart and know political workings that you're the only one who does. ALL POLITICIANS ARE CROOKS!! They lie cheat and steal for your votes and then do WHATEVER they want when they're in office. Learn that and learn it well, because until we break this cycle of Dem Rep Dem Rep Dem Rep, WE WILL NEVER BE FREE and we will ALWAYS be in debt.



    That's right vote down the answer that actually makes sense and gives the power back to the people where it belongs. But I guess it's better to let politicians run our lives than for us to live for ourselves right?
    Unfortunately these Libtards are narcissistic and therefore project the negative qualities that they have about themselves onto others. They don't want anyone to know that they are at fault. Hence, this is why they have the "Blame Bush" policy. Also they like to insult our intelligence by trying to see how much they can get away with.Why do Libtards keep blaming the GOP for not getting their legislation passed when they controlled Congress?Are you STILL pretending not to know what the filibuster is? Do you think we're stupid?



    Every single Republican helps filibuster every single bill and nominee that comes up for a vote. Apparently you think everyone in America is so deeply idiotic that we cannot figure out what that means.Why do Libtards keep blaming the GOP for not getting their legislation passed when they controlled Congress?
    That must be the working class (uneducated) assessment of the situation.



    Ideas stink. Ah, that's the basis of politics in the world.
    Have you ever heard of the term "filibuster"? Or "sixty seat majority"?



    Ah, what's the point, just another hopelessly ignorant conservative. You can't cure stupid.Why do Libtards keep blaming the GOP for not getting their legislation passed when they controlled Congress?
    The filibuster dumbo. Now You ARE the pea brain. The Publicans are masters of obfuscation and delay with their pious faces. Most of our economic problems originated under George (What? Me worry?) Bush.
    You must be one of those Americans with a pea brain. Democrats will pass nothing until the Repukelicans stop calling them Libtards.
    Have you never heard of the filibuster? Republicans have used it far more often than the Democrats ever did against the last president.
    They have to blame someone else for their failures, and deflect attention.
    WARNING: The following answer is full to the utmost brim with sarcasm.



    It's all Bush's fault.



    (Why not, that's what the president keeps saying.... he knows what he's talking about right?)
    Why should I take your question seriously when you use name-calling and rhetoric?
    Filibuster
    They can't do *anything* right.
    Great question.
    cuz they need someone to blame.
    The Party of No isn't called that for no reason.
    Don't you know the Libtards never take responsibility when things go wrong
  • book club recommendations
  • german english translation
  • Would you pass a law/legislation for children to be a required age to stay home alone?

    The state of Ohio only recommends children to be the age of 12 years of age to be home alone or 8 years old, but for only a very little amount of time. Would you make this an actual law?



    Things to consider:

    -How can we enforce it?

    -What are the pro's?

    -What are the con's

    -Is it worth making a law?Would you pass a law/legislation for children to be a required age to stay home alone?The state does not make recommendations. It passes laws. Most child endangerment type laws are done by each county, as it is the county's child protective services who enforce them. If you check into it further, the general guideline is that an 8 year old can be left home alone as long as an adult checks in with them every 3 hours. Checking in does not mean see in person. A phone call suffices. A child can not be left with other children until they are 12-13, depending on the county. You can check with your county government to find out what the age requirements are for your county.Would you pass a law/legislation for children to be a required age to stay home alone?There are too many laws now. I would support eliminating most of them.